AHMADI

Tyne shipping past and present

AHMADI

Postby teesships » Sat Nov 13, 2021 8:11 pm

AHMADI (5005964), British, 20716gt, completed St Nazaire 2-1954
1954 PERSIAN GULF - 1959 AHMADI - 1965 EVROTAS - 1967 PERMINA SAMUDRA I
BU Kaohsiung 21.3.76, work began 13.4.76 [Yun Shen Steel & Iron Works Co Ltd]

In dry-dock on the Tyne. From my negative collection taken by the late Jack (Paddy) Rutherford.
Fairly decent scan from a 6x6 negative!
ahmadixjr.jpg
Ron M
teesships
 
Posts: 10553
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 7:47 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: AHMADI

Postby northeast » Sat Nov 13, 2021 9:59 pm

Sister to MELIKA from the Furness yard in the same year, also for Afran.
northeast
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6565
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:13 pm
Location: East Yorkshire

Re: AHMADI

Postby Tynesider » Sun Nov 14, 2021 3:19 pm

Looks like the Brigham & Cowan drydock and she just fitted
Mike
Archivist for the Colvic Watson Owners Group
Tynesider
 
Posts: 798
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:14 pm
Location: Shropshire

Re: AHMADI

Postby Hornbeam » Sun Nov 14, 2021 4:52 pm

Remember the Melika, always had that American look about her with the Visor above the Bridge windows, if the Bridge windows had been round she would have completed the American look. :D
Hornbeam
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2020 4:08 pm

Re: AHMADI

Postby northeast » Sun Nov 14, 2021 6:25 pm

The small 'visor' shows up better on AHMADI than the photos we have here:

http://www.teesbuiltships.co.uk/view.ph ... sel=MELIKA
northeast
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6565
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:13 pm
Location: East Yorkshire

Re: AHMADI

Postby Hornbeam » Sun Nov 14, 2021 8:28 pm

I don't remember another vessel built at the Furness Yard fitted with a visor around that time although it was a long time ago the Liquid Sulpher Carriers may have had them :roll: Tankers were really the Furness Yards forte but a massive overspend on the Liquid Sulpher Carriers which were a totally different proposition the stainless steel tanks being on sliding shoes ( no wonder other Yards would not take them on ) left huge debts which the Yard never really recovered from. :cry:
Hornbeam
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2020 4:08 pm

Re: AHMADI

Postby northeast » Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:11 am

Yes the two Naess tankers had a visor or 'heavy eyebrow' as seen here
http://www.teesbuiltships.co.uk/view.ph ... +LOUISIANA
northeast
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6565
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 5:13 pm
Location: East Yorkshire

Re: AHMADI

Postby Hornbeam » Mon Nov 15, 2021 11:16 am

Safety costs money which was certainly the case with these two vessels as they were built under the dark cloud of a previous Sulpher Carrier a converted T2? blowing up whilst alongside, rumour had it that the Master went ashore when he got back his ship was on the bottom :o
I am surprised the Louisiana and Texas lasted so long and I would put that down to the Furness build quality on what were technically difficult builds which cost a Lorra Lorra money, somebody was way waaaaaaaaaaaay out with their costings.
Charlie Clore (Sears Holdings) was a generous employer I was reliably told that when a previous job wanted to be finished A.S.A.P. (Drydock?) which meant working over Christmas, as a thank you for those Fitters who gave up their Christmas they were not only rewarded with a generous bonus they also found Charlie Clore had turned up in his Bentley one morning with a Boot full of Whiskey and Chocolates for those that had worked and their Wives as a Thank You.
Hornbeam
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2020 4:08 pm


Return to The Tyne

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests